Mythology of modern dating methods armenien women dating
Three geologists have reported what they called the first "successful" direct dating of dinosaur bone.Will this new radioisotope dating (or radiodating) technique solve the problems that plagued older dating methods?Rather, there was likely to be a single, unifying answer that concerned the nuclear decay processes themselves.In other words, after decades of YEC failures to undermine radiometric dating with geology and geochemistry, these YEC leaders now recognize that enormous amounts of radioactive decay have occurred.Upon being presented with claims that radiometric dating is totally erroneous, a question naturally arises: If radiometric geochronology is half as bad as Woodmorappe's list suggests, then how in the world did geologists ever arrive at a tight consensus for the official dates?
Former creationist Glenn Morton examines several famous young-earth creationist arguments and provides data to illustrate their flaws.
If history is anything to go by, then the answer is no.
The process generally used to date a fossil is circuitous and subject to differing interpretations.
C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.
People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Christians, by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously.
Woodmorappe's shotgun attacks against radiometric dating even include the ridiculous accusation that concordant radiometric dates may be nothing more than products of "chance"; that is, random numbers (Woodmorappe, 1999, Figure 20, p. [new paragraph] Others had tried—and for some, the search went on for a while in the early RATE days—to find the answer in geological processes.